Should one critique/analyze things for what they are?
Or should one critique/analyze things for what they should have been/for what they are not/for what they should have aspired to be?
I think in the first scenario, we are limited by the options and the ensuing excellence, or the lack thereof. Easy life, job done, chapter closed!
But in the latter case, what is not can throw infinitesimal variables. Unfair!
Books . music . art . cinema . system . life .
people
No comments:
Post a Comment